new family

di awal semester 6 ini, ada sebuah makul yang membuatku bertemu dengan banyak orang. aq mempunyai sebuah keluarga baru dimana awalnya aq hampir tidak mengenal semua anggotanya..hampir 3 bulan lamanya qt bersama,saling bertukar pikiran tentang sebuah rencana. dan bahkan semua itu harus dibumbui dengan pertengkaran batin,debat pendapat. namun ketika smua itu telah usai kita bisa merasakan apa yang telah kita perjuangkan,jerih payah kita semua disini,kita mendapatkan apa yang kita inginkan.sebuah keluarga baru dengan sebuah sebuah harapan. terimakasih semuanya

simphoni hitam by sherina

Malam sunyi kuimpikanmu
Kulukiskan cita bersama
Namun s’lalu aku bertanya
Adakah aku di mimpimu

Di hatiku terukir namamu
Cinta rindu beradu satu
Namun s’lalu aku bertanya
Adakah aku di hatimu

T’lah kunyanyikan alunan-alunan senduku
T’lah kubisikkan cerita-cerita gelapku
T’lah kuabaikan mimpi-mimpi dan ambisiku
Tapi mengapa ku takkan bisa sentuh hatimu

Bila saja kau di sisiku
‘Kan ku beri kau segalanya
Namun tak henti aku bertanya
Adakah aku di rindumu
Tak bisakah kau sedikit saja dengar aku
Dengar simfoniku
Simfoni hanya untukmu….

T’lah kuabaikan mimpi-mimpi dan ambisiku
Tapi mengapa ku takkan bisa sentuh hatimu

UNTITLE

semua orang bisa berkata ya,, aq sanggup. tapi saat orang itu berkata sanggup belum tentu orang itu akan menjalankan apa yang dia sanggupi dengan benar.ketika seseorang datang hanya untuk mengkritik apa yang dia kerjakan. namun orang tsb tag mau mendengarkan penjelasan apapun...tidakkah itu sangat menyakitkan? dengan mengkritik tanpa tahu kebenarannya, tanpa tahu bagaimana cara kerjanya...dan orang tersebut dengan mudahnya menjatuhkannya....
kalau tak bisa memuji
janganlah mencaci,
lebih baik diam dan tutup mulutmu
kalau, memang tag suka janganlah melihat
lebih baik pergi dan tag kan kembali
ku lelah haapi semua
ku ingin kau mengerti
(by kotak)
pekerjaan itu tag semudah membalikkan telapak tangan. kita hanya hanya berencana dan Allah yang berkehendak...jadi janganlah bertanya dengan senyuman yang merendahkan...dan bertanya "kerjanya thu apa?"

Tugas Drama

Gresna Ayu Wulandari
A 320080170
Fourth Assignment
THE ZOO STORY
BY EDWARD ALBEE

The Zoo Story is American playwright Edward Albee's first play; written in 1958 and completed in just three weeks. It was originally titled Peter and Jerry. The play explores themes of isolation, loneliness, miscommunication as anathematization, social disparity and dehumanization in a commercial world.
Themes
The Zoo Star, by Edward Albee details what happens when one character enters the life of another character and quickly changes it forever. In the play, Jerry confronts Peter while he sits quietly reading on a bench in Central Park; through a quick series of events, Jerry forces Peter into helping him kill himself. Layered throughout this short one-act play are three overriding themes: absurdity versus reality, alienation and loneliness, and wealth and poverty.
Absurdity and Reality
The first Theme of The Zoo Story has to do with absurdity and reality. During the beginning of the play, Jerry initiates the conversation with Peter and carefully chooses topics with which Peter will be familiar, such as family and career. However, Jerry soon begins to insert strange comments and questions into what is on the surface


Plot
Initial Situation At the beginning, Peter and Jerry meet on a park bench in New York City's Central Park. Peter is seated on one of the benches. As the curtain rises, he is seated on the bench stage-right. He is reading a book. He stops reading, cleans his glasses, and goes back to reading.

Jerry is desperate to have a meaningful conversation with another human being. He intrudes on Peter’s peaceful state by interrogating him and forcing him to listen to stories from his life, and the reason behind his visit to the Zoo.

Conflict
When Peter states, "I really should get home; you se..." Jerry, in reaction begins to tickle Peter. Peter giggles, laughs and agrees to listen to Jerry finish telling "what happened at the zoo." Jerry stops tickling Peter, but the combination of tickling and his own mad whimsy has Peter laughing almost hysterically. As his laughter continues, then subsides, Jerry watches him, with a curious fixed smile. All at once Jerry begins pushing Peter off the bench. Peter decides to scrap for his area on the bench and becomes irritated. Suddenly, Jerry pulls a knife on Peter, and then drops it as idea for Peter to arrest. When Peter holds the knife defensively, Jerry charges him and run through himself on the knife.

Climax / Ending
In the end of this drama, Peter runs away from Jerry whose dying words” Oh ... my ... God…,,” he shakes his head and speak; a combination of scornful mimicry and supplication. Jerry is dead.

Point of view
Though all works of literature present the author’s point of view, they don’t all have a narrator or a narrative voice that ties together and presents the story. This particular piece of literature does not have a narrator through whose eyes or voice we learn the story. The narrator is just telling the story.
Style
Style of drama is the shaping of dramatic material, setting, or costumes in a specific manner. Each play will have its own unique and distinctive behaviors, dress, and language of the characters. The style of a playwright is shown in the choices made in the world of the play: the kinds of characters, time periods, settings, language, methods of characterization, use of symbols, and themes.

In this drama, the actor, Peter wears tweeds, smokes a pipe, and carries horn-rimmed glasses. Although he is moving into middle age, his dress and his manner would suggest a man younger.
Jerry, what was once a trim and lightly muscled body has begun to go to fat and while he is no longer handsome, it is evident that he once was. His fall from physical grace should not suggest debauchery. He has; to come closest to it, a great weariness.

Conclusion
The Zoo Story drama tells man and society. From the drama, can be take the lesson that someone who lives in inhuman, brutal and cruel society can drives someone to his fatal deed isolation and a lack of communication. Those are the most serious problems of modern society. Everybody needs somebody he can talk to; otherwise he becomes crazy and is driven to such a fatal deed

There is a similarity between the way in which animals live in the zoo and the way in which human beings live together/communicate with one another.

third assignment

Gresna Ayu Wulandari
A 320080170
Third Assignment
THE PROPOSAL
Character
Stepan Stepanovitch Chubukov is 70 years old and a landowner.
Natalya Stepanovna is 25 years old, Chubukov’s daughter. She is an excellent house keeper, not bad-looking, and well-educated.
Ivan Vassilevitch Lomov is 35 years old, Chubukov’s neighbor.

Setting
The setting of place in this drama is in Chubukov’s house.
The setting of time is in the evening.
Plot
Ivan Vassiliyitch Lomov, a long-time neighbor of Stepan Stepanovitch Chubukov, has come to propose marriage to Chubukov's 25-year-old daughter, Natalia. After he has asked and received joyful permission to marry Natalia, she is invited into the room, and he tries to convey to her the proposal. Lomov is a hypochondriac, and, while trying to make clear his reasons for being there, he gets into an argument with Natalia about The Oxen Meadows, a disputed piece of land between their respective properties, which results in him having "palpitations" and numbness in his leg. After her father notices they are arguing, he joins in, and then sends Ivan out of the house. While Stepan rants about Lomov, he expresses his shock that "this fool dares to make you (Natalia) a proposal of marriage!" This news she immediately starts into hysterics, begging for her father to bring him back. He does, and Natalia and Ivan get into a second big argument, this time about the superiority of their respective hunting dogs, Otkatai and Ugadi. Ivan collapses from his exhaustion over arguing, and father and daughter fear he's died. However, after a few minutes he regains consciousness, and Tschubukov all but forces him and his daughter to accept the proposal with a kiss. Immediately following the kiss, the couple get into another argument.
Ivan Vassiliyitch Lomov, a long-time neighbor of Stepan Stepanovitch Chubukov, has come to propose marriage to Chubukov's 25-year-old daughter, Natalia. After he has asked and received joyful permission to marry Natalia, she is invited into the room, and he tries to convey to her the proposal. Lomov is a hypochondriac, and, while trying to make clear his reasons for being there, he gets into an argument with Natalia about The Oxen Meadows, a disputed piece of land between their respective properties, which results in him having "palpitations" and numbness in his leg. After her father notices they are arguing, he joins in, and then sends Ivan out of the house. While Stepan rants about Lomov, he expresses his shock that "this fool dares to make you (Natalia) a proposal of marriage!" This news she immediately starts into hysterics, begging for her father to bring him back. He does, and Natalia and Ivan get into a second big argument, this time about the superiority of their respective hunting dogs, Otkatai and Ugadi. Ivan collapses from his exhaustion over arguing, and father and daughter fear he's died. However, after a few minutes he regains consciousness, and Tschubukov all but forces him and his daughter to accept the proposal with a kiss. Immediately following the kiss, the couple get into another argument.

Conclusion
The conclusion is a relationship between man and society. It appears when the Lomov visits to Chubukov’s house and want to propose Natalya. Chubukov’s attitude to Lomov is kind and polite; it can be called a good neighbor. From the story, we can take message, if we want to make a good neighborhood; we have to be nice and do not fight to each other.